The opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
444444444444
NO . 15-0419
444444444444
BOBBY BROWN, PETITIONER
V.
GEANNIE JONES AND JOHN JACKSON, RESPONDENTS
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
PER CURIAM
Bobby Brown, a state-prison inmate, filed a complaint in the Justice of the Peace Court,
Precinct No. 1, Walker County, alleging that prison officials illegally confiscated his personal, legal,
and religious materials without due process. The justice court dismissed Brown’s complaint and
Brown appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals. The Tenth Court of Appeals dismissed Brown’s
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Brown v. Jones, No. 10-15-00039-CV, 2015 WL 1316712, at *1
(Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 19, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op). Subsequently, Brown appealed the justice
court’s dismissal to the County Court at Law of Walker County, which dismissed Brown’s case for
failure to comply with Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 14.005. Brown appealed
the county court’s dismissal to the Tenth Court of Appeals but failed to file an affidavit or
1
declaration “relating to previous filings” as required by Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
chapter 14. See TEX . CIV . PRAC. & REM . CODE §§ 14.002(a), .004 (requiring “[a]n inmate who files
an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs” to file both a declaration of previous
filings and a certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement reflecting activity in at least the
prior six months). The Tenth Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal without notice or an
opportunity for Brown to cure the section 14.004(a) filing defect. ___ S.W.3d ___, ___.
In two prior opinions, McLean v. Livingston, ___ S.W.3d ___, ___ (Tex. 2016) (per curiam),
and Ex Parte N.C., ___ S.W.3d ___, ___ (Tex. 2016) (per curiam), we held that the court of appeals
must give an inmate an opportunity to cure a section 14.004 filing defect in an appellate proceeding,
through an amended filing, before the court can dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, we grant Brown’s
petition for review, and without hearing oral argument, TEX . R. APP . P. 59.1, we reverse the court
of appeals’ judgment and remand the case to the court of appeals to allow Brown an opportunity to
cure his section 14.004(a) filing defect.
OPINION DELIVERED: July 1, 2016
2