Opinion

National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-1 v. Angela Annis-Acebo

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jun 7, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-3 v. Angela Annis-

Acebo; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-4 v. Angela

Annis-Acebo; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-1 v.

Angela Annis-Acebo

Appellate case numbers: 01-16-00107-CV; 01-16-00109-CV; 01-16-00110-CV

Trial court case number: 2013V-0076; 2013V-0077; 02013V-0078

Trial court: 155th District Court of Austin County

The reporter’s record in these causes was due on March 11, 2016. The court reporter

advised us on March 28, 2016, that no financial arrangements had been made for the reporter’s

record. We issued notice of no payment for the reporter’s record on March 28, 2016, response

was due on April 25, 2016. When no response was received, this Court issued an order on May

10, 2015, that we would decide those issues that required no reporter’s record and set the brief due

in 30 days. On May 12, 2016, appellant provided proof of payment for the reporter’s record. On

May 26, 2016, appellant filed a motion to reconsider our order. On May 31, 2016, the court

reporter filed a notice that she had inadvertently failed to request an extension after being paid for

the reporter’s record and that she does not have Exhibit 1. She states the record is ready to file

“except for the missing exhibit and the final payment.”

We grant the motion, withdraw our order of May 10, and order the court reporter, Vicki

Brown, to file the reporter’s record, without any missing exhibits, in these causes on or before

June 17, 2016.

Because the court reporter states that Exhibit 1 is not included in the files, there is an

inaccuracy in the reporter’s records that may be corrected either by (1) the parties’ agreement on

an accurate exhibit, see TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(1); or (2) if the parties are unable to agree, by

obtaining a trial court ruling on what constitutes an accurate exhibit, after notice and a hearing,

and an order by the trial court to the court reporter including any exhibits to file in the appellate

court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(2).

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket.

The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the issue regarding the disputed

exhibit is resolved. The court orders the parties to file a status report with the court by June 21,

2016 regarding the completion of the reporter’s record. The court will also consider an appropriate

motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own

motion.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually

Date: June 7, 2016

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.