Opinion

Brown v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision

  • 139 A.D.3d 1214
  • 29 N.Y.S.3d 830
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
May 12, 2016
Status
Published
On the bench
Lahtinen, McCarthy, Lynch, Clark, Aarons
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.4%

The opinion

State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: May 12, 2016 521510

________________________________

In the Matter of ROHAN BROWN,

Petitioner,

v

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY

SUPERVISION et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: March 29, 2016

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Rohan Brown, Napanoch, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus

Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to

review a determination of the Superintendent of Eastern

Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating

certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

challenging a determination finding him guilty of possessing

contraband not authorized by the superintendent, possessing an

authorized item that has been altered and tampering with an

electrical device. Initially, respondents concede, and we agree,

that the misbehavior report did not provide petitioner with

adequate notice with regard to the charges of possessing an

authorized item that has been altered and tampering with an

electrical device. Accordingly, we annul the determination to

-2- 521510

that extent but remittal for a redetermination of the penalty is

unnecessary because the penalty has been completed and no loss of

good time was imposed (see Matter of Branch v Annucci, 133 AD3d

942, 943 [2015]; Matter of Macedonio v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1313,

1313 [2014). Turning to the remaining charge, the misbehavior

report noting the numerous items of contraband discovered in

petitioner's cell and petitioner's testimony provide substantial

evidence to support the finding that petitioner possessed

contraband (see Matter of Macedonio v Fischer, 116 AD3d at 1313).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.,

concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs,

by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of

possessing an authorized item that has been altered and tampering

with an electrical device; petition granted to that extent and

the Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility is directed

to expunge all references to those charges from petitioner's

institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.