The opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
GRANDEYE LIMITED,
Appellant
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1622, 2015-1624, 2015-1625
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
IPR2013-00546, IPR2013-00547, IPR2013-00548.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
STEPHEN YEE CHOW, Burns & Levinson, LLP, Boston,
MA, argued for appellant.
PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld,
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repre-
sented by EMILY CURTIS JOHNSON, DAVID VONDLE, ZE-WEN
JULIUS CHEN, CONO A. CARRANO, ASHRAF FAWZY.
JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS
W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, STACY BETH
MARGOLIES.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 28, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court