Opinion

Thomas Petrovsky a/k/a Thomas J. Petrovsky and Nancy Petrovsky a/k/a Nancy R. Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, etc.

  • 185 So. 3d 700
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269
  • 2016 WL 625385
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Feb 17, 2016
Status
Published
Author
Levine
On the bench
Levine, Gross, Warner
Cited by
15 cases
Authority
More cited than 84.1%

concluding that attorneys' fees affidavits that were filed prior to trial were insufficient to support fee award and thus reversing attorneys' fees award and remanding for trial court to conduct evidentiary hearing

How later courts described this case

  • concluding that attorneys' fees affidavits that were filed prior to trial were insufficient to support fee award and thus reversing attorneys' fees award and remanding for trial court to conduct evidentiary hearing
  • concluding that bank’s attorney’s fees affidavit filed prior to trial was insufficient to support fee award and remanding to trial court for evidentiary hearing
  • explaining that by “requesting that the court hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of attorney’s fees, appellants preserved their right to a hearing”
  • reversing portion of final judgment awarding attorney's fees where attorney's fees affidavit filed before trial was insufficient to support fee award and trial court failed to hold evidentiary hearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THOMAS PETROVSKY a/k/a Thomas J. Petrovsky and NANCY

PETROVSKY a/k/a Nancy R. Petrovsky,

Appellants,

v.

HSBC BANK, USA, as Indenture Trustee for Friedman, Billings, Ramsey

Group, Inc. (FBR) Securitization Name - FBRSI 2005-2, ANY AND ALL

UNKNOWN PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, UNDER, AND

AGAINST THE HEREIN NAMED INDIVIDUAL WHO ARE NOT KNOWN

TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY

CLAIM AN INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES,

OR OTHER CLAIMANTS, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TENANT #1,

TENANT #2, TENANT #3, and TENANT #4,

Appellees.

No. 4D14-1485

[February 17, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; Lucy Chernow Brown, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2008-CA-

008391 XXXXMB.

Thomas Erskine Ice of Ice Appellate, Royal Palm Beach, for appellants.

Joseph D. Wargo and Susan Capote of Wargo & French, LLP, Miami,

for appellee HSBC Bank, USA.

LEVINE, J.

Appellants appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of

HSBC Bank. We find HSBC proved standing as the holder of the note

because the allonge containing the blank endorsement was sufficiently

affixed to the note. See Purificato v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 41 Fla. L.

Weekly 64331 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 6, 2016). We also find no error in the

admission of HSBC’s exhibits under the business record exception to the

hearsay rule.

However, we reverse the portion of the final judgment awarding

attorney’s fees without an evidentiary hearing. “‘Reasonable attorney’s

fees’ generally are not liquidated damages and require a hearing. Absent

an evidentiary hearing, the fee award will be reversed for a hearing unless

there is an indication that the right to a hearing was waived.” Zumpf v.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 43 So. 3d 764, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)

(citation omitted); see also Roggemann v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.,

670 So. 2d 1073, 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

After the trial court orally ruled in favor of HSBC, appellants requested

an evidentiary hearing to determine a reasonable amount of attorney’s

fees. HSBC claimed that during trial it asked the court to take judicial

notice that it filed an affidavit of attorney’s fees, and appellants did not

raise any objection. The court found that appellants waived their right to

an evidentiary hearing.

Contrary to the trial court’s finding, appellants did not waive their right

to an evidentiary hearing on attorney’s fees. During trial, HSBC merely

referred to the fact that it had filed attorney’s fees affidavits. HSBC did

not request that the court take judicial notice of the affidavits. Moreover,

the affidavits were not introduced as an exhibit at trial. By requesting that

the court hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of attorney’s fees,

appellants preserved their right to a hearing.

In Diwakar v. Montecito Palm Beach Condominium Ass’n, 143 So. 3d

958 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), the bank filed an affidavit of attorney’s fees before

trial, but the affidavit was not admitted into evidence during trial. This

court found the evidence insufficient to support the attorney’s fee award,

and reversed and remanded for the trial court to take additional evidence

on attorney’s fees. Similarly, in Wagner v. Bank of America, N.A., 143 So.

3d 447, 448 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), the court remanded for an evidentiary

hearing on the amount of attorney’s fees where the only evidence of fees

was an affidavit filed by the bank prior to trial.

Like in Diwakar and Wagner, the attorney’s fees affidavits HSBC filed

before trial were insufficient to support the fee award. Accordingly, we

reverse the portion of the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees, and

remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing thereon.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GROSS and WARNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.