Opinion

Daniel Sherman Brown v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
Jan 21, 2016
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Sherman Brown v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-15-00291-CR; 01-15-292-CR; 01-15-00293-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1414895, 1422157; 1422158

Trial court: 183rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s brief was originally due on September 30, 2015. Two extensions were

granted until December 4, 2015. No brief was filed. On December 23, 2015, notice issued that

the brief was late and gave appointed counsel ten days to respond. No response was received.

When an appellant in a criminal case fails to file a brief, Rule 38.8(b)(4) requires the

appellate court to issue an order, directing the trial court to hold a hearing and make certain

findings. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.3(b)(2)-(3). If the trial court finds that appellant no longer desires

to prosecute the appeal, or that appellant is not indigent, but has not made the necessary

arrangements for filing a brief, the appellant court may consider the appeal without briefs. Id. at

38.8(b)(4).

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing at

which appellant and appointed counsel, Kelly Ann Smith, shall be present in person. 1 The court

coordinator of the trial court shall set a date for said hearing and notify the parties, including

appellant. We direct the trial court to make appropriate written findings of fact and conclusions

of law and to execute any necessary orders on these issues:

1) Whether appellant still wishes to pursue this appeal;

2) If so, whether appointed counsel, Kelly Ann Smith, has abandoned the appeal and

other counsel should be appointed; and

3) To set a date certain (in no event to be more than 30 days from the date of the

1 If appellant is now incarcerated, he may appear by closed video teleconference. Any such teleconference

must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full

motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any

attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request, appellant and his counsel shall be able to

communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the

State.

abatement hearing) for appellant to file a brief.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (f); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b).

The trial court’s findings and recommendations (separate and apart from any docket sheet

notation) and any orders issued pursuant to this hearing shall be included in a supplemental

clerk’s record and filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. The

trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing and file the reporter’s

record with the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. Additionally, if the

hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified electronic copy of the hearing shall be

filed in this Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental

clerk’s record and reporter’s record of the hearing are filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 21, 2016

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.