Opinion

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States

  • 491 F.2d 1258
  • 33 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 813
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9857
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Feb 28, 1974
Status
Published
On the bench
Celebrezze, Engel, Per Curiam, Rosenstein
Cited by
14 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.8%

tobacco sheds functioned to store and age the tobacco

How later courts described this case

  • tobacco sheds functioned to store and age the tobacco
  • tobacco drying sheds are not buildings because they provide only incidental working space
  • tobacco storage sheds are § 38 property because not generally adaptable
  • tobacco storage sheds not buildings

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on March 30, 1973, in which the Appellee was awarded a refund of federal income taxes.

Upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, it is ordered that the Judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of District Judge Allen. 369 F.Supp. 1283 (1974).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.