Opinion

Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Nov 12, 2014
Status
Published
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302

Plaintiff-Appellant,

D.C. No.

v. 2:12-cv-08315-

MWF-VBK

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware

Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a

California limited liability company, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees,

and

NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, an

individual, AKA Sam Bacile; MARK

BASSELEY YOUSSEF; ABANOB

BASSELEY NAKOULA; MATTHEW

NEKOLA; AHMED HAMDY; AMAL

NADA; DANIEL K. CARESMAN;

KRITBAG DIFRAT; SOBHI BUSHRA;

ROBERT BACILY; NICOLA BACILY;

THOMAS J. TANAS; ERWIN

SALAMEH; YOUSSEFF M. BASSELEY;

MALID AHLAWI,

Defendants.

Filed November 12, 2014

2 GARCIA V. GOOGLE, INC.

ORDER

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,

it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule

35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Wardlaw, Owens and Friedland did not participate

in the deliberations or vote in this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.