Opinion

Sullivan v. Oracle Corporation

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Feb 17, 2009
Status
Published
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 41.0%

The opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD SULLIVAN; DEANNA EVICH;  No. 06-56649

RICHARD BURKOW, D.C. No.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, CV-05-00392-AHS

v. Central District of

ORACLE CORPORATION, a Delaware  California,

corporation; ORACLE UNIVERSITY, Santa Ana

form unknown, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees. WITHDRAWING

 OPINION

Filed February 17, 2009

Before: William A. Fletcher and Ronald M. Gould,

Circuit Judges, and Louis H. Pollak,*

Senior District Judge.

ORDER

We have today issued an order requesting the California

Supreme Court to answer three certified questions of Califor-

nia law presented in this case. We hereby withdraw our pub-

lished opinion in this case, Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., 547 F.3d

1177 (9th Cir. 2008), pending a decision by the California

Supreme Court on those questions. Appellants’ Petition for

Rehearing and Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc are

dismissed as moot.

*The Honorable Louis H. Pollak, Senior United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

1839

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.