Opinion

Ronald Cortes v. Local Board Number 7, Rogelio Lopez v. Local Board Number 146

  • 468 F.2d 626
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Nov 8, 1972
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

468 F.2d 626

Ronald CORTES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 7 et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Rogelio LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 146 et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 28295, 28356.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1972.

Mario Obledo, Pete Tijerina, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

William S. Sessions, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Robert V. Zener, Reed Jonston, Jr., Attys., Civil Div., Appellate Section, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Tex., Jack Sparks, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Donald L. Horowitz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

It having been made known to the court that Ronald Cortes, appellant in No. 28295, is past the age of 26 and is not eligible for induction under current Selective Service policies, and that Rogelio Lopez, appellant in No. 28356, has been reclassified as IV-F, the appeal in each of these causes is dismissed as moot.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.