Opinion

William N. Grosch v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service

  • 453 F.2d 1337
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11775
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 18, 1972
Status
Published
On the bench
Bryan, Per Curiam, Russell, Young
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.7%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief to require a reopening of his classification after notice of induction by his Selective Service Board. Relief was denied by the District Court on the basis of Section 10(b) of the Selective Service Act of 1967, which prohibits judicial review of the classification of a registrant after the issuance of an order of induction. We affirm. The Courts have, it is true, established certain minor exceptions to the prohibition on judicial review as prescribed by Section 10(b)

1

but the registrant did not bring himself within such exceptions.

Affirmed.

1

. See, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 ; Breen v. Selective Service Local Board (1970) 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 , and Grosfeld v. Morris (4th Cir. 1971) 448 F.2d 1004 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.