The opinion
USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-1335
RUSSELL BROWN, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
WALLY ARMSTRONG, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
Russell M. Brown on brief pro se. ________________
Lee Carl Bromberg, Julia Huston, and Bromberg & Sunstein LLP on __________________ ____________ _______________________
brief for Wally Armstrong and Gator Golf Enterprises, Inc.
Scott P. Lewis, Robert L. Brennan, Jr. and Palmer & Dodge LLP, on ______________ _______________________ __________________
brief for appellees American Telecast Corporation, Wally Armstrong
Golf, Inc., Kenny Rogers and Pat Summerall.
____________________
NOVEMBER 6, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. Plaintiff Russell Brown has appealed the ___________
grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Brown's
appellate brief is inappropriately styled as if it was a
motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We do not consider
such motions in the first instance. In any event, we have
carefully considered the parties' briefs and the record on
appeal. Nothing that Brown has raised in this appeal
warrants overturning the district court's grant of summary
judgment.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. ________
-2-