Opinion

Brown, Tamala Nicole

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Sep 18, 2013
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.3%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-71,316-02

EX PARTE TAMALA NICOLE BROWN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 05-02621-CRF-272-B

IN THE 272ND DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZOS COUNTY

Per curiam .

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). A jury convicted Applicant of aggravated

assault and sentenced her to eighteen years’ confinement. The conviction was affirmed on direct

appeal. Brown v. State , No. 10-06-00015-CR (Tex.App.—Waco del. Mar. 14, 2007).

Applicant asserts that her trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. She argues that he

failed to adequately confer with her before trial, that he failed to call witnesses and present other

evidence in support of her claim of self-defense, that he failed to advise her of the consequences of

testifying in her own defense, and that he failed to consult with her regarding the calling of the victim

to testify and that he did call the victim, who provided damaging testimony. The trial court held an

evidentiary hearing on these issues, heard testimony, entered findings, and recommends that relief

be denied. This Court previously dismissed this writ application as non-compliant because an

incorrect form application was used for the habeas filing. See Tex. R. App. P. 73.2. Habeas counsel

has pointed out that the form used was correct at the time it was filed with the trial court in 2010 and

asks this Court to reconsider the dismissal. Habeas counsel is correct, and this Court withdraws the

prior dismissal for non-compliance.

After an independent review of the record provided, this Court agrees with the trial court that

relief should be denied. Applicant fails to show both deficient performance and resulting harm in her

ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).

This Court adopts the findings of the trial court, and relief is denied.

Filed: September 18, 2013

Do not publish

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.