Opinion

Brown, David Arnold

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 18, 2008
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 38.1%

The opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-69,999-01, -02, -03 & -04

EX PARTE DAVID ARNOLD BROWN, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 15,208-B, 15,209-B, 15,210-B & 15,211-B IN THE 181 ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM RANDALL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of five counts

of indecency with a child and sentenced to five terms of ten years' imprisonment. The Seventh Court

of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Brown v. State , Nos. 07-05-00102-CR, 07-05-00103-CR, 07-05-00104-CR & 07-05-00105-CR (Tex. App.-Amarillo, June 20, 2006, no pet.).

Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to determine whether Applicant was competent

to plead guilty and to advise the trial court that Applicant had recently been hospitalized and

administered drugs that affected his mental capacity. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might

entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke , 13 S.W.3d

791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held

in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. Trial counsel has filed an affidavit in response to Applicant's

claim. If it believes counsel's affidavit is not sufficient, the trial court shall provide counsel with a

second opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim. The trial court may also use any means set out

in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its

personal recollection. Id.

Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If he is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex.

Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of trial counsel was

deficient and, if so, whether his deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also

make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the

disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of

the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing

all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing

or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. The reporter's record of the plea

proceedings shall also be returned to this Court. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this

Court.

Filed: June 18, 2008

Do not publish

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.