Opinion

Richard M. Cornwell v. State Board of Education

  • 428 F.2d 471
  • 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8786
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 9, 1970
Status
Published
On the bench
Sobeloff, Craven, Butzner
Cited by
14 cases
Authority
More cited than 79.9%

adopting per curiam the full opinion in Cornwell v. State Board of Educ., 314 F.Supp. 340 (D.Md.1969)

How later courts described this case

  • adopting per curiam the full opinion in Cornwell v. State Board of Educ., 314 F.Supp. 340 (D.Md.1969)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

Parents of pupils attending Baltimore County, Maryland, schools seek to enjoin the State Board of Education from implementing the board’s bylaw 720:3, which provides in part:

“It is the responsibility of the local school system to provide a comprehensive program of family life and sex education in every elementary and secondary school for all students as an integral part of the curriculum including a planned and sequential program of health education.”

The board adopted the bylaw as an appropriate measure for health and education after it studied the problem of pregnant students. The plaintiffs allege the bylaw violates the First Amendment and the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The district court, construing the allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, held that the constitutional challenge lacks merit. We agree, and, for the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm its dismissal of the action.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.