Opinion

Ezra Charles Brown v. State

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Filed
May 31, 2007
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 35.2%

The opinion

Opinion issued May 31, 2007

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-06-00195-CR

____________

EZRA CHARLES BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1021855

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ezra Charles Brown, pleaded guilty to the offense of sexual assault

of a child, and after a pre-sentence investigation hearing, the trial court assessed

punishment at confinement for six years. We affirm.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and

a brief concluding that this appeal is without merit. Counsel's brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967),

by presenting a professional evaluation of the record that demonstrates the lack of

arguable grounds of error. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App.

1978); Moore v. State , 845 S.W.2d 352, 353 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1992,

pet. ref'd).

Counsel represents that he served a copy of the brief on appellant. Counsel

also advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se

brief. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). More than

30 days have passed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief. We have carefully

reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We find no reversible error in the record,

and agree that the appeal is without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of the

trial court.

We grant counsel's motion to withdraw. (1) See Stephens v. State , 35 S.W.3d

770, 771 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.).

Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes and Higley.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

1. Counsel has a duty to inform appellant of the result of his appeal and also to

inform him that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals. See Ex parte Wilson , 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.