Opinion

United States v. Charles Robert Young

  • 406 F.2d 528
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 7, 1969
Status
Published
On the bench
Boreman, Bryan, Per Curiam, Winter
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.2%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Young appeals his conviction by the court on a charge of failing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. After having been classified as I-A and after being ordered to submit to induction he applied for a classification of I-O, Conscientious Objector, which application was denied.

A decision of the Selective Service Board as to a registrant’s classification made in conformity with regulations may be overturned by the courts only if it clearly appears that there is no basis in fact for such classification. Upon careful examination of the record we cannot say that there is no basis in fact for the Board’s determination. Therefore, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

1

Affirmed.

1

. Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); United States v. Jones, 382 F.2d 255 (4 Cir. 1967); United States v. Jackson, 369 F. 2d 936, 938 (4 Cir. 1966); Blalock v. United States, 247 F.2d 615, 619 (4 Cir. 1957).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.