Opinion

Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego

  • 781 F.3d 1106
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4941
  • 2015 WL 1381752
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Mar 26, 2015
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Thomas
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 68.9%

The opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION MAR 26 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE No. 10-56971

LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE

BUNCHER, Dr.; MARK CLEARY; D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02371-IEG-BGS

CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL

ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION,

Plaintiffs - Appellants, ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Intervenor - Pending,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM

D. GORE, individually and in his

capacity as Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion and order denying

motions to intervene shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth

Circuit.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.