The opinion
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 52
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CR-14-383
Opinion Delivered February 4, 2015
ANTONIO GAMMON APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN
APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR-2012-1090]
V.
HONORABLE RANDY F.
STATE OF ARKANSAS PHILHOURS, JUDGE
APPELLEE
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO
WITHDRAW GRANTED
BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge
Antonio Gammon pleaded guilty to residential burglary and theft of property and
was placed on probation in November 2012. His probation was revoked in January 2014
after the circuit court found that he had committed several violations of his probation.
On appeal, Gammon’s counsel argues that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and
asks to withdraw as counsel. The clerk of our court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s
motion and brief to Gammon in accordance with Rule 4-3(k)(2) of the Arkansas Rules of
the Supreme Court, informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Gammon
has not filed pro se points for reversal. Because counsel has complied with the
requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm.
The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but
whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Tucker v. State, 47 Ark. App. 96, 885
S.W.2d 904 (1994). Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to
1
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 52
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold
that Gammon’s appeal is wholly without merit. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and
(b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this
memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirming the circuit
court’s revocation.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
VAUGHT and BROWN, JJ., agree.
C. Brian Williams, for appellant.
No response.
2