Opinion

Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.

  • 771 F.3d 647
  • 2014 WL 5840553
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Nov 12, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Thomas, Wardlaw, Owens, Friedland
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.0%

The opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-08315-MWF-

VBK

v.

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware ORDER

Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a

California limited liability company,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA,

an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; MARK

BASSELEY YOUSSEF; ABANOB

BASSELEY NAKOULA; MATTHEW

NEKOLA; AHMED HAMDY; AMAL

NADA; DANIEL K. CARESMAN;

KRITBAG DIFRAT; SOBHI BUSHRA;

ROBERT BACILY; NICOLA

BACILY; THOMAS J. TANAS;

ERWIN SALAMEH; YOUSSEFF M.

BASSELEY; MALID AHLAWI,

Defendants.

Page 2

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Wardlaw, Owens and Friedland did not participate in the

deliberations or vote in this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.