Opinion

Dhalow v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

  • 2010 Ohio 4976
Court
Ohio Court of Claims
Filed
Oct 7, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Travis
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 32.2%

The opinion

[Cite as Dhalow v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010-Ohio-4976.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center

65 South Front Street, Third Floor

Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

www.cco.state.oh.us

ABDURAHMAN MOHAMED DHALOW

Plaintiff

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION

Defendant

Case No. 2009-05137

Judge Alan C. Travis

Magistrate Matthew C. Rambo

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} Plaintiff brings this action alleging that an employee of defendant

assaulted him. A trial was held on the issue of liability. On July 22, 2010, the

magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.

{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to

a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not

the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by

Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” On August 19, 2010, with leave of court, plaintiff filed his

objections. Defendant did not file a response.

{¶ 3} At all times relevant, plaintiff was an inmate in the custody and control of

defendant at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility pursuant to R.C. 5120.16. In his

complaint, plaintiff alleges that on February 17, 2009, Corrections Officer Philip Markins

used unreasonable force on plaintiff for speaking in a disrespectful manner. Plaintiff

also alleges that after the incident, Markins wrote a conduct report stating that plaintiff

“started to throw a cup of liquid at him.” Plaintiff further alleges that he was found not

Case No. 2009-05137 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

guilty. The magistrate determined that Markins acted in self defense when he

administered chemical mace against plaintiff and that such force was not excessive.

{¶ 4} In his first objection, plaintiff asserts that the magistrate erred in granting

defendant’s motion to quash plaintiff’s subpoena issued to Larry Greene. The court

disagrees.

{¶ 5} Civ.R. 45(3)(a) provides that “[o]n timely motion, the court from which the

subpoena was issued shall quash or modify the subpoena, or order appearance or

production only under specified conditions, if the subpoena * * * [f]ails to allow

reasonable time to comply.” The record shows that on April 22, 2010, plaintiff issued a

subpoena to Greene; that on April 23, 2010, defendant filed a motion to quash the

subpoena; and that on April 26, 2010, defendant filed an affidavit from Greene wherein

Greene stated that he received the subpoena on April 26, 2010, one day before trial, but

that he was scheduled to attend a mandatory training seminar on the day of trial. In

light of these facts, the court finds that the magistrate complied with Civ.R.45 in

quashing the subpoena. Plaintiff’s first objection is OVERRULED.

{¶ 6} In his second objection, plaintiff asserts that the magistrate erred in finding

that plaintiff was holding a cup containing an unknown liquid when Markins appeared

before plaintiff’s cell. The magistrate specifically found Markins to be a more credible

witness than plaintiff. It is well-settled that the magistrate, as the trier of fact, is in the

best position to weigh the testimony and assess the credibility of witnesses. Seasons

Coal Co. v. Cleveland (1984), 10 Ohio St.3d 77, 80. Moreover, inasmuch as plaintiff

failed to provide the court with a transcript of the evidence necessary for the court to

review his objection, plaintiff’s objection is OVERRULED. See Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iii).

{¶ 7} Upon review of the record, the magistrate’s decision and the objections,

the court finds that the magistrate has properly determined the factual issues and

appropriately applied the law. Therefore, the objections are OVERRULED and the court

adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of

Case No. 2009-05137 -3- JUDGMENT ENTRY

fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of

defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all

parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

_____________________________________

ALAN C. TRAVIS

Judge

cc:

Amy S. Brown Abdurahman Mohamed Dhalow, #527-094

Kristin S. Boggs P.O. Box 45699

Assistant Attorneys General Lucasville, Ohio 45699

150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor

Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130

GWP/mdw/cmd

Filed October 7, 2010

To S.C. reporter October 12, 2010

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.