Opinion

Graham v. Like Milton State Park

  • 2011 Ohio 3535
Court
Ohio Court of Claims
Filed
Apr 5, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Durfey
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 32.2%

The opinion

[Cite as Graham v. Like Milton State Park, 2011-Ohio-3535.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center

65 South Front Street, Third Floor

Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

www.cco.state.oh.us

STEPHEN GRAHAM

Plaintiff

v.

LAKE MILTON STATE PARK

Defendant

Case No. 2010-11331-AD

Clerk Miles C. Durfey

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FINDINGS OF FACT

{¶ 1} On July 11, 2010, plaintiff, Stephen Graham , suffered personal injury and

property damage when he drove his vehicle onto the premises of defendant, Lake

Milton State Park, and an unattended gate swung into the path of plaintiff's car striking

the hood, shattering the windshield, and striking plaintiff in the head. Plaintiff filed this

complaint seeking to recover $1,969.93, the cost of automobile repairs, ambulance

transport to the hospital, medical co-pays for follow-up care, and the replacement cost

for a GPS navigation system that had been mounted on the windshield. Plaintiff has

implied that defendant, as owner of the damage-causing gate, should bear liability for

the damages incurred. Plaintiff submitted the filing fee with the complaint.

{¶ 2} Defendant denied liability based on the fact that plaintiff was a recreational

user of Lake Milton State Park at the time of the property damage occurrence.

Defendant explained that Lake Milton State Park is open to the public free of charge

and that plaintiff did not pay a fee to use the facilities.

{¶ 3} Plaintiff filed a response wherein he contended that the recreational user

statute did not apply to the facts of this matter in that the gate in question was left

unsecured by a negligent act of defendant’s employee. Plaintiff cited the holding of Ryll

v. Columbus Fireworks Display, Co. 95 Ohio St. 3d 467, 2002-Ohio-2584, ¶15 wherein

the Supreme Court of Ohio found that inasmuch as the injury was caused by shrapnel

propelled from exploding fireworks and that the fireworks were not part of the

"premises" as defined in R.C. 1533.18(A), the immunity conferred by the statutory

language did not apply. In addition, plaintiff argued that the relevant statute cited by

defendant was unconstitutional.1 Finally, plaintiff noted that his insurance company had

reimbursed the cost of the ambulance such that his damage claim was reduced to

$954.33.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

{¶ 4} Since this incident occurred at Lake Milton State Park, defendant qualifies

as the owner of the "premises" under R.C. 1533.18, et seq.

{¶ 5} "Premises" and "recreational user" are defined in R.C. 1533.18, as follows:

{¶ 6} "(A) 'Premises' means all privately-owned lands, ways, and waters and

any buildings and structures thereon, and all privately owned and state-owned lands,

ways and waters leased to a private person, firm, or organization, including any

buildings and structures thereon. "(B) 'Recreational user' means a person to whom

permission has been granted, without the payment of a fee or consideration to the

owner, lessee, or occupant of premises, other than a fee or consideration paid to the

state or any agency of the state or a lease payment fee paid to the owner of privately

owned lands, to enter upon the premises to hunt, fish, trap, camp, hike or swim, or to

operate a snowmobile, all-purpose vehicle, or four-wheel drive motor vehicle, or to

engage in other recreational pursuits." R.C. 1533.181 states:

{¶ 7} "(A) No owner, lessee, or occupant of premises:

{¶ 8} "(1) Owes any duty to a recreational user to keep the premises safe for

entry or use; "(2) Extends any assurance to a recreational user, through the act of

giving permission, that the premises are safe for entry or use."

{¶ 9} Pursuant to the enactment of R.C. 2743.02(A), the definition of premises

in R.C. 1533.18(A) effectively encompassed state-owned lands. Moss v. Department of

Natural Resources (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 138, 16 O.O. 3d 161, 404 N.E.2d 742. R.C.

1

Plaintiff’s constitutional challenge is not well-taken. See McCord v. Division of Parks and

Recreation (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 72, 8 O.O. 3d 77, 375 N.E. 2d 50.

1533.181(A)(1), which provides, inter alia, that an owner of premises owes no duty to a

recreational user to keep the premises safe for entry or use, applies to the state.

Fetherolf v. State (1982), 7 Ohio App. 3d 110, 7 OBR 142, 454 N.E.2d 564. Plaintiff is

clearly a recreational user, having paid no fee to enter the premises. Owing no duty to

plaintiff, defendant clearly has no liability under a negligence theory. Loudermilk v.

Buckeye Lake State Park, Ct. of Cl. No. 2003-10406-AD, 2004-Ohio-1344.

{¶ 10} To the extent that plaintiff characterized the occurrence as having been

caused “by the negligence of a park employee, not by the premises,” the court finds that

defendant still has immunity from liability under the recreational user statute. See

Mitchell v. City of Blue Ash, 181 Ohio App. 3d 804, 2009-Ohio-1887, ¶10 (holding that

“the basis of the Ryll decision was not that the negligence of a city employee or other

person had contributed to the injury, but rather that the injury had not arisen from part of

the premises “ and thus concluding that “in cases decided by the Ohio Court of Claims

since the Ryll decision, that court has held the state government immune under the

recreational-user statute even where the plaintiff had alleged negligence on the part of

public employees.”) See also Gudliauskas v. Lakefront State Park, Ct. of Cl. No. 2004-

08464, 2005-Ohio-5598 (allegedly negligent driving on part of park ranger causing injury

to skater.)

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center

65 South Front Street, Third Floor

Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

www.cco.state.oh.us

STEPHEN GRAHAM

Plaintiff

v.

LAKE MILTON STATE PARK

Defendant

Case No. 2010-11331-AD

Clerk Miles C. Durfey

ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION

Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth

in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor

of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff.

________________________________

MILES C. DURFEY

Clerk

Entry cc:

Stephen Graham Charles G. Rowan

4448 Swan Lake Drive Department of Natural Resources

Copley, Ohio 44321 2045 Morse Road, D-3

Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693

SJM/laa

3/21

Filed 4/5/11

Sent to S.C. reporter 7/8/11

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.