Opinion

State v. Alsup

  • 128 Ohio St. 3d 340
  • 2011 Ohio 227
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 25, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
O'Connor, Stratton, O'Donnell, Cupp, Brown, Pfeifer, Lanzinger
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 52.6%

The opinion

[Cite as State v. Alsup, 128 Ohio St.3d 340, 2011-Ohio-227.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ALSUP, APPELLEE.

[Cite as State v. Alsup, 128 Ohio St.3d 340, 2011-Ohio-227.]

Discretionary appeal accepted, judgment of the court of appeals vacated, and

cause remanded to the court of appeals for application of State v.

Johnson.

(No. 2010-1748 — Submitted January 4, 2011 — Decided January 25, 2011.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 23641,

2010-Ohio-4038.

__________________

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of

State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the

cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State

v. Johnson.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, CUPP, and

MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would not accept the

discretionary appeal.

__________________

Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and R.

Lynn Nothstine, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

__________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.