Opinion

State v. Brenson

  • 128 Ohio St. 3d 396
  • 2011 Ohio 1425
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 30, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 53.9%

The opinion

[Cite as State v. Brenson, 128 Ohio St.3d 396, 2011-Ohio-1425.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BRENSON, APPELLANT.

[Cite as State v. Brenson, 128 Ohio St.3d 396, 2011-Ohio-1425.]

Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. VI and VII, judgment

of the court of appeals vacated in part, and cause remanded to the court of

appeals for application of State v. Johnson.

(No. 2010-2206 — Submitted March 1, 2011 — Decided March 30, 2011.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Delaware County, No. 09-CA-18,

2010-Ohio-4645.

__________________

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law Nos.

VI and VII.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing

appellant’s 14th assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v.

Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is

remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v.

Johnson.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

__________________

Carol O’Brien, Delaware County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kyle E.

Rohrer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

William T. Cramer, for appellant.

______________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.