Opinion

Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found.

  • 2011 Ohio 5936
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 23, 2011
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.7%

The opinion

[Cite as Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 130 Ohio St.3d 401, 2011-Ohio-5936.]

ALEXANDER, APPELLEE, v. CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION, APPELLANT.

[Cite as Alexander v. Cleveland Clinic Found.,

130 Ohio St.3d 401, 2011-Ohio-5936.]

Discretionary appeal accepted, court of appeals’ judgment vacated, and cause

remanded for application of Dohme v. Eurand Am., Inc.

(No. 2011-1282—Submitted November 1, 2011—Decided November 23, 2011.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 95727,

2011-Ohio-2924.

__________________

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is

remanded to the court of appeals for application of Dohme v. Eurand Am., Inc.,

130 Ohio St.3d 168, 2011-Ohio-4609, 956 N.E.2d 825.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

__________________

Michael T. Conway & Co. and Michael T. Conway, for appellee.

Frantz Ward, L.L.P., Michael N. Chesney, Christopher G. Keim, and

Kelly S. Lawrence, for appellant.

______________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.