The opinion
[Cite as State v. Winningham, 132 Ohio St.3d 77, 2012-Ohio-1998.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. WINNINGHAM, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. Winningham, 132 Ohio St.3d 77, 2012-Ohio-1998.]
Discretionary appeal accepted, court of appeals’ judgment vacated, and cause
remanded for application of United States v. Jones.
(No. 2012-0099—Submitted March 20, 2012—Decided May 10, 2012.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-11134,
2011-Ohio-6229.
__________________
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is
remanded to the court of common pleas for application of United States v. Jones,
___ U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012).
O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
__________________
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Melynda
Machol, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Raymond L. Katz, for appellant.
______________________