Opinion

Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace

  • 2012 Ohio 5495
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 5, 2012
Status
Published
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 56.3%

The opinion

[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace, 134 Ohio St.3d 359, 2012-Ohio-5495.]

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., APPELLEE, v. WALLACE,

APPELLANT, ET AL.

[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace, 134 Ohio St.3d 359,

2012-Ohio-5495.]

Certified conflict question answered in the negative—Court of appeals’ judgment

reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with Fed.

Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Schwartzwald.

(Nos. 2011-1693 and 2011-1694—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided

December 5, 2012.)

APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Warren County,

No. CA2010-10-103, 2011-Ohio-4174.

__________________

{¶ 1} The certified-conflict question is answered in the negative. The

judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial

court for further proceedings consistent with Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v.

Schwartzwald, 134 Ohio St.3d 13, 2012-Ohio-5017, 979 N.E.2d 1214.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

__________________

Thompson Hine, L.L.P., Scott A. King, and Terry W. Posey Jr., for

appellee.

Andrew M. Engel, for appellant, Betty Wallace.

______________________

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.