The opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
WIRELESS INK CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, AND
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC.,
Defendants.
----------------------
WIRELESS INK CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FACEBOOK, INC. AND GOOGLE, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2013-1683, -1684
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in Nos. 11-cv-01751 and
10-cv-01841, Judge P. Kevin Castel.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
JEREMY S. PITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New
York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of coun-
sel on the brief was PAPOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari
Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas.
JOHN CHRISTOPHER ROZENDAAL, Kellogg, Huber, Han-
sen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC,
argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief
for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. JOFFRE and MELANIE
L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc.,
were HEIDI L. KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH
L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On
the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were KEVIN
X. MCGANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM GAHTAN, White &
Case LLP, of New York, New York.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court