Opinion

Brown v. Henderson

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jul 8, 2013
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge James E. Boasberg
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RANDY G. BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 13-77 (JEB)

KAYA HENDERSON, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Randy Brown filed a one-paragraph pro se Complaint on January 18, 2013. He

opaquely alleged discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, but offered

no facts whatsoever in support. See ECF No. 1 (Complaint). The District of Columbia moved to

dismiss the case on April 24. See ECF No. 12. The next day, the Court issued an Order

directing Plaintiff to respond to the Motion by May 28 or risk the Court’s deeming the matter

conceded. See ECF No. 13. The Court subsequently granted Plaintiff an extension until July 1,

although he sought it after the deadline had expired. See Minute Order, May 30, 2013. As

Plaintiff has still never responded, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the

case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.

/s/ James E. Boasberg

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge

Date: July 8, 2013

1

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.