Opinion

Brown v. Holder

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jan 3, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.3%

The opinion

FILED

JAN-a 2014

Cl¢fk, U.S. District arm

Bankruptcy comm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF C()LUMBIA

DERRICK L. BROWN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v ) Civil Action No. { ,_{ f 13

)

ERIC HOLDER, JR., et al., )

)

Resp0ndents. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitioner, who currently is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in

Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, has filed a "First Amendment Petition" asserting his actual innocence

to the crimes of which he has been convicted. See generally Pet. at l-Z. He further has asserted

that he was prosecuted in ways that violate his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and F0urteenth

Amendments to the United States Constitution. See ia'. at 2. Among other relief, petitioner

asked this Court "to vacate conviction and sentence immediately; to dismiss the indictment and

charges immediately; to order respondents liable for all damages; and to immediately discharge

and release" him." Ia’. at 3.

"A prisoner in custody under sentence of a [federal] court . . . claiming the right to be

released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws

of the United States . . . may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or

correct the sentence." 28 U.S.C. § 2255(a) (emphasis added). Because petitioner was convicted

and sentenced in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, see Pet. at

§§

2, this Court cannot address a challenge to the legality of petitioner’s criminal sentence. See Ojo

v. Immigration & Natura/izatz`on Serv., l06 F.3d 680, 683 (5th Cir. l997). Nor can this Court

entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus for his immediate release from custody because

neither petitioner nor his custodian is within its territorial jurisdiction. See Stokes v. U.S. Parole

Comm ’n, 374 F.3d 1235, 1239 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Th Court will dismiss this action.

An Order is issued separately.

Uniied States District Judge

DATE:

/L/ZV//j

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.