Opinion

Jessie Johnson v. Owen Murray

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jan 20, 2014
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.0%

The opinion

Case: 13-20161 Document: 00512470319 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

No. 13-20161 December 13, 2013

Summary Calendar

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

JESSIE L. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

OWEN JOSEPH MURRAY, D.O.; S. JOHNSON, D.O. or Medical Doctor.;

SINGLETON, D.O. or Medical Doctor., Medical Doctor BETTY WILLIAMS,

Medical Doctor LANETTE LINTHICUM; RICK THALER, Director; JONI

WHITE, Assistant Director for Classification; VANESSA JONES, Chairman,

State Classification Committee, and the State Classification Committee;

ROBERT BEHRNS, D.O. or Medical Doctor,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CV-3395

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jessie L. Johnson, Texas prisoner # 1293083, appeals the dismissal, on

the summary judgment motion of Dr. Owen Murray and Dr. Lanette

Linthicum, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his Eighth Amendment

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 13-20161 Document: 00512470319 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/13/2013

No. 13-20161

rights were violated by the defendants’ deliberate indifference to his serious

medical needs. Johnson concedes that his demand for injunctive relief has

been mooted. Murray and Linthicum pleaded qualified immunity.

We reject Johnson’s claim that Murray and Linthicum are liable in their

official and individual capacities because they were aware that he needed

surgery rather than the antimicrobial treatment administered by prison

healthcare providers and they failed to exercise their authority to cause

surgery to be performed. The official capacity claim fails because the State

invoked its sovereign immunity from a damages judgment. See Frew v.

Hawkins, 540 U.S. 432, 437 (2004); Goodman v. Harris County, 571 F.3d 388,

394-95 (5th Cir. 2009). The individual capacity claim fails because the

summary judgment evidence presented by Johnson establishes at best only

malpractice by his attending physicians or Johnson’s disagreement with them

about proper treatment. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a); Stewart v. Murphy, 174 F.3d

530, 534 (5th Cir. 1999); Banuelos v. McFarland, 41 F.3d 232, 235 (5th Cir.

1995). Because there was no constitutional violation at all, Murray and

Linthicum cannot be liable. See Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 232 (1991);

Rockwell v. Brown, 664 F.3d 985, 990-91 (5th Cir. 2011); Thompkins v. Belt,

828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th Cir. 1987).

Additionally, we discern no basis on which to conclude that the district

court abused its discretion in declining to allow Johnson to amend his

complaint a second time. See Jones v. Robinson Prop. Grp., 427 F.3d 987, 994

(5th Cir. 2005). We decline also to disturb the district court’s decision not to

appoint counsel for Johnson. See Williams v. Ballard, 466 F.3d 330, 335 (5th

Cir. 2006); Cupit v. Jones, 835 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.