“We hold, however, that the trial court’s reference to [Butler v. Derr Flooring, 285 A.2d 538 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1971),] in its original opinion was harmless error since the trial court affirmed the ZHB’s decision that applied the appropriate burden of proof, and the error had no effect on the outcome of this case.”
How later courts described this case
- “We hold, however, that the trial court’s reference to [Butler v. Derr Flooring, 285 A.2d 538 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1971),] in its original opinion was harmless error since the trial court affirmed the ZHB’s decision that applied the appropriate burden of proof, and the error had no effect on the outcome of this case.”
- “We hold, however, that the trial court’s reference to [Butler v. Derr Flooring, 285 A.2d 538 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1971
- also noting that a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the zoning hearing board
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
4 A.3d 1056 (2010)
RUSSELL
v.
STATE ETHICS COM'N.
No. 22 WAL (2010).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 11, 2010.
Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.