stating that compliance with Section 42.21 is jurisdictional
How later courts described this case
- stating that compliance with Section 42.21 is jurisdictional
- dismissing property owner’s suit for lack of jurisdiction because “[c]ompliance with [Texas Tax Code section] 42.21 is jurisdictional”
- dismissing property owner’s suit for lack of jurisdiction because “[c]ompliance with § 42.21 is jurisdictional”
- when statute creates a right not existing at common law and prescribes a remedy to enforce the right, compliance with statute is jurisdictional
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the Appraisal Review Board of the Taylor County Appraisal District. The trial court erroneously assumed jurisdiction and granted the relief sought by the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel. The court of appeals, with one member dissenting, dismissed Taylor County Appraisal District’s appeal pursuant to Tex.R. Civ.P. 414 (now Tex.R.App.P. 74) for failure to file a brief. 711 S.W.2d 306 . We hold that the court of appeals erred in dismissing the appeal rather than the cause. The record shows that International Church of the Foursquare Gospel failed to comply with § 42.21 of the Texas Tax Code (Vernon’s Supp.1986) by its failure to include the Taylor County Appraisal District as a party within 45 days after receiving notice that a final order had been entered. Compliance with § 42.21 is jurisdictional and the jurisdictional error of the trial court is apparent on the face of the record. The court of appeals’ decision conflicts with § 42.21 of the Texas Tax Code.
See Poly-America, Inc. v. Dallas County Appraisal District,
704 S.W.2d 936 (Tex.App.—Waco 1986, no writ).
See also Cox v. Johnson,
638 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Tex.1982) (stating the rule that fundamental error survives in those cases in which absence of jurisdiction is apparent on the face of the record) and
Bullock v. Amoco Production Co.,
608 S.W.2d 899, 901 (Tex.1980) (holding that when a statute creates a right not existing at common law and prescribes a remedy to enforce the right, compliance with the statutory requirements is jurisdictional). Therefore, we grant the application for writ of error and pursuant to Tex.
*161
R.App.P. 133(b), without hearing oral argument, we reverse the judgments of the court of appeals and the trial court and dismiss the cause.