Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Giallanza

  • 208 F.2d 243
  • 33 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2137
  • 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3729
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Filed
Nov 19, 1953
Status
Published
On the bench
Chase, Clark, Brennan
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.9%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Board adopted in part the findings of the Trial Examiner, together with his conclusions and recommendations, and held that the respondent had discharged her employees, Zirkelbach, Kinnee, Wyckoff, Gerould, Carey, Coo-gan, Lodato, and Furlong, in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136 , 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq; that she had contributed to the support of, and dominated an association of her employees known as the Modern Cleaners Employees Association in violation of § 8 (a)(2) of the Act and thereby had interfered in violation of § 8(a)(1), with the exercise by her employees of their statutory rights. She was ordered to cease and desist; to offer said employees reinstatement and to make them whole for loss of pay; to disestablish the Modern Cleaners Employees as a collective bargaining representative of any of her employees and to post the usual notices.

The respondent has opposed this petition to enforce the order on the-ground that the evidence in the record is insufficient to support the findings. A review of the record considered as a whole shows, however, that there is substantial evidence in support of the-Board’s findings though it is true that there was also conflicting evidence tending to show that at least the discharge of Zirkelbach was for cause. That be

*244

ing so, the findings are now conclusive as the Taft-Hartley Act provides. 61 Stat. 148 , 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e).

That, in effect, disposes of the respondent’s resistance to the petition to enforce the order since the acts of the respondent, as found, were violations of the Act as held by the Board. N. L. R. B. v. Peter Cailler Kohler Swiss Chocolates Co. Inc., 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 503 ; N. L. R. B. v. Kennametal, Inc., 3 Cir., 182 F.2d 817 ; N. L. R. B. v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261 , 58 S.Ct. 571 , 82 L.Ed. 831 ; American Enka Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 4 Cir., 119 F.2d 60 ; N. L. R. B. v. Charles R. Krimm Lumber Co., 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 194 .

Order enforced.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.