Opinion

Rafferty v. Schatzman

  • 81 N.J. Super. 64
  • 194 A.2d 591
Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Oct 28, 1963
Status
Published
On the bench
Judges Goldmann, Kilkenny and Collester
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.6%

The opinion

81 N.J. Super. 64 (1963)

194 A.2d 591

JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY CLERK OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; PETER BIRO, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; AND FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND MIDDLESEX DEMOCRATIC COUNTY COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 28, 1963.

Decided October 28, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. John J. Rafferty argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Warren W. Wilentz argued the cause for respondents Schatzman and Biro.

Mr. John A. Lynch appeared for respondent Middlesex Democratic County Committee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge HALPERN, 81 N.J. Super. 58 ( Law Div. 1963). We consider the statute, N.J.S.A. 19:27-11, as completely controlling.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.