Opinion

Zoning Hearing Board v. Dove

  • 69 Pa. Commw. 486
  • 451 A.2d 812
  • 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1649
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 1, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Craig
On the bench
Blatt, Williams, Craig
Cited by
9 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.5%

zoning hearing boards also lack standing and are not proper party appellants because they are not injuriously affected

How later courts described this case

  • zoning hearing boards also lack standing and are not proper party appellants because they are not injuriously affected

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

The Zoning Hearing Board of Derry Township here seeks to overturn an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, reversing a decision of that board, which had denied landowner Ernest Dove’s request for a variance.

The long-settled rule is that a zoning hearing board has no standing to appeal a final order of a court of common pleas.

Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjust

*487

ment’s Appeal,

313 Pa. 523 , 170 A. 867 (1934). Here the township itself could have intervened in the common pleas court under Section 1009 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code

1

in order to have assured standing as a party to appeal. Moreover, our holding in

Gilbert v. Montgomery Township Zoning Hearing Board,

58 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 296 , 427 A.2d 776 (1981), mandating the municipality’s participation below as a prerequisite to an appeal by it, would have presented no barrier here because we gave that holding only prospective application.

2

However, at no point in these proceedings has the township sought to intervene or otherwise to become the appellant.

As the Supreme Court indicated in

Lansdowne,

the zoning hearing board can no more take an appeal to an appellate court than a master could. And, as

Horn v. Township of Hilltown,

461 Pa. 745 , 337 A.2d 858 (1975) established, the interests of the board and the township must be treated separately in zoning cases. Hence, without a lawful party appellant, this proceeding has no jurisdictional existence before us, and we must dismiss it

sua sponte. See National Development Corporation v. Township of Harrison,

64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 54 , 438 A.2d 1053 (1982).

*488

Order

Now, November 1, 1982, the appeal of the Zoning Hearing Board of Derry Township from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, No. 1553 S Term 1980, is hereby quashed.

1

Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805,

as amended,

53 P.S. §11009.

2

In

Gilbert ,

we held that a municipality will have standing to bring a zoning appeal to this court only if it properly becomes a party before the lower court, as an appellant or intervenor. However, we made

Gilbert

prospective, to take effect only as to cases in which the zoning hearing board’s decision was issued after thirty days following

Gilbert’s

filing date of April 7, 1981.

See National Development Corp. v. Township of Harrison,

64 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 54 , 438 A.2d 1053 (1982). Here, the board’s decision was made on February 20, 1980.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.