construing 49 U.S.C. § 646
How later courts described this case
- construing 49 U.S.C. § 646
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks direct, review in this court of certain regulations of general applicability and prospective effect issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board.
1
The statute governing review of orders of the Civil Aeronautics Board
2
is not sufficiently different from that in the Natural Gas Act
3
to warrant our distinguishing this from United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 86 U.S.App.D.C. -, 181 F.2d 796 . What we said there with regard to the conditions necessary for our review of administrative action, and the availability of other remedies, is also applicable here.
Dismissed.
1
. The pertinent regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board are found in the Board's order dated November 4, 1949, which adopted Amendment No. 1 to Part 242, and Amendment No. 2 to Part 291, Economic Regulations, Civil Aeronautics Board, Regulations Serial No. ER-154 and ER-153. They deal generally with the relations between ticket agents and irregular air carriers. ER-154 prescribes the form of tiekets to be used by large irregular carriers, requires that agreements with ticket agents in regard to passenger traffic be reduced to writing, etc. It also> provides that the exemption heretofore given large irregular carriers will not be available to the extent that such carriers transport passengers obtained in disregard of such requirements. ER-153 requires the filing with the Board of all contracts entered into between carriers and ticket agents.
2
. 49 U.S.O.A. § 646.
3
. 15 U.S.C.A. § Wr(b).