holding that the law was uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious speech in a valedictory address
How later courts described this case
- holding that the law was uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious speech in a valedictory address
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 99-30647
_____________________
LARONDA GEORGE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LIVINGSTON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD;
RICK WENTZEL; LOUIS SCHULTZ,
Defendants-Appellees.
_______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Middle District of Louisiana
(U.S.D.C. No. 98-CV-466-B)
_______________________________________________________
September 8, 2000
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Laronda George appeals from the qualified-immunity dismissal of her claims
against appellees Rick Wentzel and Louis Schultz. We affirm because no
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances
set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
constitutional violation of George’ rights under clearly established law was alleged.
See Guidry v. Broussard, 897 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1990) (holding that the law was
uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious
speech in a valedictory address). Appellees were therefore entitled to qualified
immunity.
AFFIRMED.
2