The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7720
SAMUEL L. BROWN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY HATHAWAY; LILLIAN GILLIAM; LT. BIGGS; MS. WALTON,
Defendants– Appellees,
and
A. SPRUILL; GIBBS; SANDERLIN; C/O BROWN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03004-BO)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brown V. Hathaway, No. 5:09-ct-03004-BO (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 29, 2009; Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2