Opinion

Priceplay, Inc. v. Google, Inc.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Filed
Feb 11, 2011
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

______________________

PRICEPLAY, INC. (FORMERLY PERFORMANCE

PRICING, INC.),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GOOGLE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

AOL, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

2010-1306

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas in No. 07-CV-0432, Chief Judge

Randall R. Rader, sitting by designation.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

RICHARD E. LYON, III, Dovel & Luner, LLP, of Santa

Monica, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With

him on the brief was GREGORY S. DOVEL.

DAVID A. PERLSON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &

Sullivan, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for

defendant-appellee Google, Inc. With him on the brief

were CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN, EMILY C. O’BRIEN and

ANTONIO R. SISTOS.

ROBERT L. BURNS, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,

Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, for

defendant-appellee AOL, LLC.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (BRYSON, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.