Opinion

Kirkman v. State

  • 232 Ind. 563
  • 114 N.E.2d 878
  • 1953 Ind. LEXIS 242
Court
Indiana Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 28, 1953
Status
Published
Author
Flanagan
On the bench
Flanagan
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 86.6%

The opinion

Flanagan, J.

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and this appeal follows- Pending appeal, appellant escaped from the Indiana Reformatory and subsequently absented himself from this State. It appears that he is now in custody of law enforcement officers of another State, being charged with the commission of new crimes and offenses allegedly committed subsequent to his escape here.

Where the appellant in a criminal case absents himself from the custody of the State and from its jurisdiction, and becomes a fugitive from justice, he cannot prosecute his appeal.

Doren

v.

State

(1914), 181 Ind. 314 , 104 N. E. 500 .

The mere fact that he has been captured and is held in another State cannot alter the above rule.

The Attorney General of Indiana has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.

Motion sustained.

Gilkison, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 114 N. E. 2d 878 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.