Opinion

Brown v. Christopher Street Owners Corp.

  • 87 N.Y.2d 938
  • 641 N.Y.S.2d 221
  • 663 N.E.2d 1251
  • 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 63
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Feb 13, 1996
Status
Published
On the bench
Kaye and Judges Simons, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick Concur Judge Titone Taking No Part
Cited by
58 cases
Authority
More cited than 97.8%

The opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff Arthur Brown was injured when he fell from the second-floor ledge of a cooperative apartment building in lower Manhattan. Defendant Anne Hack had hired plaintiff to wash the windows of her one-bedroom apartment and, at the time of his fall, plaintiff was attempting to wash the exterior of one of the windows.

Although Labor Law § 240 (1), the first section of Labor Law article 10 ("Building Construction, Demolition and Repair Work”), provides for absolute liability against any contractor or owner who fails to furnish an employee with the appropriate scaffolding, ladders, slings or other safety devices during the "erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, [or] cleaning” of a building, the "cleaning” encompassed under the statute does not include the routine, household window washing at issue here

(Connors v Boorstein,

4 NY2d 172, 175 ). Unlike the painting of a house

(Rivers v Sauter,

26 NY2d 260 ) or the cleaning of all the windows of a large, nonresidential structure such as a school

(Koenig v Patrick Constr. Corp.,

298 NY 313 ), the routine cleaning of the five windows of a single cooperative apartment by an individual engaged by the apartment owner is not the kind of undertaking for which the Legislature sought to impose liability under Labor Law § 240.

In light of the parties’ failure to address Labor Law § 202 ("Protection of the public and of persons engaged at window cleaning and cleaning of exterior surfaces of buildings”) in their briefs, we do not reach the question whether it provides the exclusive Labor Law remedy in cases such as this involving window cleaning

(see, Terry v Young Men’s Hebrew Assn.,

78 NY2d 978 , 979).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur; Judge Titone taking no part.

*940

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.