Opinion

State v. City of Newark

  • 90 N.J. Super. 68
  • 216 A.2d 246
Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Jan 18, 1966
Status
Published
On the bench
Judges Goldmann, Foley and Collester
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.3%

The opinion

90 N.J. Super. 68 (1966)

216 A.2d 246

STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 11, 1966.

Decided January 18, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Mr. William H. Walls argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Joseph A. Ward, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Crane in the Law Division, reported at 87 N.J. Super. 38 ( Law Div. 1965).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.