Opinion

United States v. Hartec Enterprises, Inc.

  • 130 B.R. 929
  • 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1535
  • 1991 WL 172896
Court
District Court, W.D. Texas
Filed
Jul 30, 1991
Status
Published
Author
Hudspeth
On the bench
Hudspeth
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 78.5%

rejecting hypothetical test in connection with similar statutory language of § 365(e)(2)(A)

How later courts described this case

  • rejecting hypothetical test in connection with similar statutory language of § 365(e)(2)(A)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER OF REMAND

HUDSPETH, District Judge.

On this day came on to be considered the above two cases, which are appeals from orders and judgments of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. The Court finds that the parties have compromised and settled their differences, and that the following orders should be entered.

It is ORDERED that the orders and judgments of the United States Bankruptcy Court from which appeals were taken be, and they are hereby, VACATED and SET ASIDE.

It is further ORDERED that these causes be, and they are hereby, REMANDED to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas with directions to dismiss.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.