Opinion

Workman v. State

  • 170 Tex. Crim. 621
  • 343 S.W.2d 446
  • 1961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 5287
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Mar 1, 1961
Status
Published
Author
Woodley
On the bench
Woodley
Cited by
309 cases
Authority
More cited than 99.7%

stating that generally appellate court has jurisdiction of appeal by criminal defendant only after conviction

How later courts described this case

  • stating that generally appellate court has jurisdiction of appeal by criminal defendant only after conviction
  • holding that court’s judgment discharging criminal defendant from liability was not appealable judgment
  • stating order denying counsel does not fall within the categories of appealable interlocutory orders
  • Judgment discharging defendant on charge of aggravated assault after conviction for simple assault was not a judgment of conviction.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge

Appellant was tried in the County Court of Cochran County, before a special judge and a jury, upon complaint and information alleging that he committed an aggravated assault upon Raymond Kuykendall, a special deputy sheriff who was in the discharge of his official duties.

Appellant sought to have the jury instructed to acquit if they found that Kuykendall was not a special deputy sheriff discharging his official duties, but the court submitted both aggravated assault and simple assault.

*622

The jury returned the following verdict: “Guility of simple assault, and we the jurors assess the defendant fine maximum Penalty.”

The judgment rendered and entered recites that the following verdict was returned and entered: “We, the jury, find the defendant Ed Workman guilty, and assess a fine of $25.00 and Court cost of $58.30.”

Following this verdict, the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted recites:

“It is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the defendant, Ed Workman, be immediately discharged from all further liability upon the charge for which he has herein been tried and that he go hence without day.”

The judgment rendered in effect upheld appellant’s contention that he was entitled to acquittal if not found guilty of aggravated assault.

In any event, the judgment appearing in the transcript is not a judgment of conviction from which an appeal may be taken to this court.

The appeal is dismissed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.