Opinion

Spuck v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

  • 605 Pa. 409
  • 990 A.2d 725
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 26, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.3%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2010, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

1

1

. Additionally, we hereby deny Appellant’s “Motion for Permission to Attach Exhibits” filed on December 13, 2009. Certain of the exhibits Appellant seeks to attach to his brief are dehors the record and cannot be considered. See

Commonwealth v. Bracalielly,

540 Pa. 460 , 658 A.2d 755, 763 (1995) (law of Pennsylvania is well settled that matters which are not of record cannot be considered on appeal).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.