Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 200 Ga. App. 537
  • 408 S.E.2d 836
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1062
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Filed
Jul 16, 1991
Status
Published
Author
McMurray
On the bench
McMurray, Sognier, Andrews
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 59.3%

prosecution not required to prove that the victim thought the defendant was shooting at her

How later courts described this case

  • prosecution not required to prove that the victim thought the defendant was shooting at her

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Via indictment, defendant was charged with the offense of aggravated assault by making an assault upon the person of Rawlins Hinton with a gun. Defendant was convicted and, following the denial of his motion for a new trial, he appealed.

Held-.

1. The evidence was more than sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty of the offense of aggravated assault beyond a reasonable doubt.

Jackson v. Virginia,

443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560);

Steele v. State,

196 Ga. App. 330 (2) ( 396 SE2d 4 ). It was not incumbent upon the prosecution to prove that the victim was aware the defendant was shooting at him. See

Sutton v. State,

245 Ga. 192 (1), 193 ( 264 SE2d 184 ); OCGA § 16-5-21.

2. The trial court did not err in ruling that defendant’s in-custody statement was made voluntarily. “A trial court’s findings as to factual determinations and credibility relating to the admission of in-custody statements will be upheld on appeal unless clearly erroneous. [Cit.]”

Stephens v. State,

170 Ga. App. 342, 343 ( 317 SE2d 627 ). The

*538

mere fact that defendant did not sign a written statement (a police officer reduced defendant’s statement to writing) is of no consequence. See

Stephens v. State,

170 Ga. App. 342, 343 , supra;

Myrick v. State,

155 Ga. App. 496, 497 (2) ( 271 SE2d 637 ) (1980).

Decided July 16, 1991.

John H. Tarpley,

for appellant.

Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Nancy B. AUstrom, Assistant District Attorneys,

for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.