Opinion

Koutnik v. Brown

  • 552 U.S. 809
  • 128 S. Ct. 39
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Filed
Oct 1, 2007
Status
Published
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 60.9%

"[G]ang symbolism is not static; symbols change and are added as gangs expand their bases and combine with other groups."

How later courts described this case

  • "[G]ang symbolism is not static; symbols change and are added as gangs expand their bases and combine with other groups."
  • when plaintiff appealed from judgment, and “decade of protracted and needless litigation” was due solely to “intransigence of plaintiff’s counsel,” conditional offers to pay sufficed to toll insurer’s liability for postjudgment interest
  • inmates’ outgoing mail scrutinized under Martinez standard

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

128 S.Ct. 39 (2007)

Joseph D. KOUTNIK, petitioner,

v.

Lebbeus BROWN, et al.

No. 06-1171.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 1, 2007.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.