voluntarily adopted safety standards to protect the public are some evidence that a reasonably prudent person would adhere to their requirements
How later courts described this case
- voluntarily adopted safety standards to protect the public are some evidence that a reasonably prudent person would adhere to their requirements
- voluntary adoption of rules as guide for protection of public is admissible as some evidence of reasonably prudent conduct
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
179 S.E.2d 453 (1971)
278 N.C. 104
John Irving SLADE, by his next friend, Irvln W. Slade
v.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 3, 1971.
Marshall, Williams & Gorham, Addison Hewlett, Jr., for plaintiff.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., William Lewis Sauls, Staff Attorney for the State.
Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 178 S.E.2d 316 . Denied.