The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 LARRY OKEITH EASTER, Case No. 2:26-cv-0842-DJC-JDP (PS)
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER
14 JERRY BROWN, et al.,
15 Defendants.
16
17
This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
18
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 13, 2026, the Magistrate Judge filed
19
findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which
20
contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be
21
filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
22
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct.
23
, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law
24
are reviewed de novo. , 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)
25
(“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the
26
district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds
27
the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper
28
1 | analysis.
2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 13, 2026, are
4 ADOPTED;
5 2. Plaintiff's first amended complaint, contained in ECF No. 4, is DISMISSED
6 without leave to amend; and
7 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
8
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 | Dated: _August 13, 2026 “Daniel CoD tto—
Hon. Daniel It |. Cod
" UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28